Phenom II X3 N870 vs Core 2 Duo T9500
Aggregate performance score
Core 2 Duo T9500 outperforms Phenom II X3 N870 by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Duo T9500 and Phenom II X3 N870 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2396 | 2434 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Duo | 3x AMD Phenom II |
| Power efficiency | 3.06 | 2.87 |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Champlain (2010−2011) |
| Release date | 10 January 2008 (16 years ago) | 16 December 2010 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $530 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo T9500 and Phenom II X3 N870 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 3 (Tri-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 3 |
| Base clock speed | 2.6 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | 3600 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | 6 MB | 1.5 MB |
| L3 cache | 6 MB L2 Cache | no data |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 1V-1.25V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo T9500 and Phenom II X3 N870 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | BGA479,PBGA479,PGA478,PPGA478 | S1 (S1g4) |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T9500 and Phenom II X3 N870. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | 86x MMX(+), 3DNow!(+), SSE(1,2,3,4A),-64, AMD-V |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo T9500 and Phenom II X3 N870 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T9500 and Phenom II X3 N870 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo T9500 and Phenom II X3 N870. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.13 | 1.06 |
| Recency | 10 January 2008 | 16 December 2010 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 3 |
| Threads | 2 | 3 |
Core 2 Duo T9500 has a 6.6% higher aggregate performance score.
Phenom II X3 N870, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core 2 Duo T9500 and Phenom II X3 N870.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T9500 and Phenom II X3 N870, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
