E2-9010 vs Core 2 Duo T9400

Place in the ranking	2758	2712
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Intel Core 2 Duo	AMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency	1.73	4.35
Architecture codename	Penryn (2008−2011)	Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date	15 July 2008 (16 years ago)	1 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$316	no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo T9400 and E2-9010 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	2	2
Base clock speed	2.53 GHz	2 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.53 GHz	2.2 GHz
Bus rate	1066 MHz	no data
L1 cache	128 KB	no data
L2 cache	6 MB	2048 KB
L3 cache	6 MB L2 Cache	no data
Chip lithography	45 nm	28 nm
Die size	107 mm²	124.5 mm²
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	90 °C
Number of transistors	410 Million	1200 Million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
VID voltage range	1.05V-1.162V	no data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T9400 and E2-9010 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socket	BGA479,BGA956,PBGA479,PGA478	FP4
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	10-15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T9400 and E2-9010. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	Virtualization,
AES-NI	-	+
FMA	-	FMA4
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	-	no data
Demand Based Switching	-	no data
FSB parity	-	no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo T9400 and E2-9010 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	no data
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T9400 and E2-9010 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	-	+
VT-x	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo T9400 and E2-9010. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	no data	DDR4-1866
Max memory channels	no data	1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	no data	AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
iGPU core count	no data	2
Enduro	-	+
Switchable graphics	-	+
UVD	-	+
VCE	-	+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core 2 Duo T9400 and E2-9010 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort	-	+
HDMI	-	+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core 2 Duo T9400 and E2-9010 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	no data	DirectX® 12
Vulkan	-	+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo T9400 and E2-9010.

PCIe version	no data	3.0
PCI Express lanes	no data	8

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo T9400 0.64

E2-9010 0.69
+7.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo T9400 1011

E2-9010 1093
+8.1%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Core 2 Duo T9400 2818
+50.6%

E2-9010 1871

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Core 2 Duo T9400 5268
+61.2%

E2-9010 3268

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Core 2 Duo T9400 31
+19.8%

E2-9010 37.14

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.64	0.69
Recency	15 July 2008	1 June 2016
Chip lithography	45 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	10 Watt

E2-9010 has a 7.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 250% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core 2 Duo T9400 and E2-9010.

Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T9400 and E2-9010, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.