Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 vs Core 2 Duo T9300
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Duo T9300 and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2422 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Duo | Transmeta Crusoe |
| Power efficiency | 2.84 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Crusoe (2001) |
| Release date | 10 January 2008 (16 years ago) | 1 June 2001 (23 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $316 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo T9300 and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 1 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | 266 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 6 MB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 6 MB L2 Cache | no data |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 55 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | 36.8 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 1V-1.25V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo T9300 and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | BGA479,PGA478 | CBGA-474 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 7 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T9300 and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo T9300 and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T9300 and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 10 January 2008 | 1 June 2001 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 7 Watt |
Core 2 Duo T9300 has an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 188.9% more advanced lithography process.
Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800, on the other hand, has 400% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo T9300 and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T9300 and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
