EPYC 7401 vs Core 2 Duo T9300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo T9300
2008, $316
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.95
EPYC 7401
2017, $1,850
24 cores / 48 threads, 170 Watt
31.35
+3200%

EPYC 7401 outperforms Core 2 Duo T9300 by a whopping 3200% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2703162
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.048.21
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoAMD EPYC
Power efficiency1.157.83
DesignerIntelAMD
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Naples (2017−2018)
Release date10 January 2008 (17 years ago)29 June 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$316$1,850

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7401 has 20425% better value for money than Core 2 Duo T9300.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo T9300 and EPYC 7401 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads248
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz3 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
Multiplierno data20
L1 cache128 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache6 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cache64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size107 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range1V-1.25Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T9300 and EPYC 7401 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketBGA479,PGA478TR4
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt170 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T9300 and EPYC 7401. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo T9300 and EPYC 7401 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T9300 and EPYC 7401 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo T9300 and EPYC 7401. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data2 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidthno data170.671 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo T9300 and EPYC 7401.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Core 2 Duo T9300 0.95
EPYC 7401 31.35
+3200%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Core 2 Duo T9300 1670
Samples: 890
EPYC 7401 55280
+3210%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.95 31.35
Recency 10 January 2008 29 June 2017
Physical cores 2 24
Threads 2 48
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 170 Watt

Core 2 Duo T9300 has 385.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7401, on the other hand, has a 3200% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD EPYC 7401 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core 2 Duo T9300 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7401 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo T9300
Core 2 Duo T9300
AMD EPYC 7401
EPYC 7401

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 358 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T9300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 11 votes

Rate EPYC 7401 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core 2 Duo T9300 and EPYC 7401, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.