Core 2 Duo P7370 vs Core 2 Duo T9300

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo T9300
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
1.09
+110%

Core 2 Duo T9300 outperforms Core 2 Duo P7370 by a whopping 110% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo T9300 and Core 2 Duo P7370 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24172875
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
Power efficiency2.841.90
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date10 January 2008 (16 years ago)1 January 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$316no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo T9300 and Core 2 Duo P7370 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz1066 MHz
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache6 MB3 MB
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cache3 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1V-1.25V1V-1.25V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T9300 and Core 2 Duo P7370 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGA479,PGA478PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T9300 and Core 2 Duo P7370. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching--
FSB parity--

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo T9300 and Core 2 Duo P7370 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T9300 and Core 2 Duo P7370 are enumerated here.

VT-x++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo T9300 1.09
+110%
Core 2 Duo P7370 0.52

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo T9300 1670
+111%
Core 2 Duo P7370 790

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Core 2 Duo T9300 2799
+27.7%
Core 2 Duo P7370 2191

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Core 2 Duo T9300 5190
+29%
Core 2 Duo P7370 4022

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Duo T9300 2258
+31.9%
Core 2 Duo P7370 1712

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.09 0.52
Recency 10 January 2008 1 January 2009
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 25 Watt

Core 2 Duo T9300 has a 109.6% higher aggregate performance score.

Core 2 Duo P7370, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, and 40% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Duo T9300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo P7370 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T9300 and Core 2 Duo P7370, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo T9300
Core 2 Duo T9300
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370
Core 2 Duo P7370

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 326 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T9300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Core 2 Duo P7370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo T9300 or Core 2 Duo P7370, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.