Atom C3808 vs Core 2 Duo T9300
Aggregate performance score
Atom C3808 outperforms Core 2 Duo T9300 by a whopping 240% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2659 | 1706 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.04 | 0.43 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Duo | Intel Atom |
| Power efficiency | 1.15 | 5.46 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Goldmont (2016−2017) |
| Release date | 10 January 2008 (17 years ago) | 15 August 2017 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $316 | $369 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Atom C3808 has 975% better value for money than Core 2 Duo T9300.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo T9300 and Atom C3808 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| Multiplier | no data | 22 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 672 KB |
| L2 cache | 6 MB | 12 MB |
| L3 cache | 6 MB L2 Cache | 12 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 86 °C |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 1V-1.25V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo T9300 and Atom C3808 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | BGA479,PGA478 | FCBGA1310 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T9300 and Atom C3808. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| QuickAssist | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | - |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo T9300 and Atom C3808 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | + |
| Secure Boot | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | - |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T9300 and Atom C3808 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo T9300 and Atom C3808. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4: 2133 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 256 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 34.134 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo T9300 and Atom C3808.
| PCIe version | no data | 3 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
| USB revision | no data | 3 |
| Total number of SATA ports | no data | 16 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 8 |
| Integrated LAN | no data | 4x10/2.5/1 GBE |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.95 | 3.23 |
| Recency | 10 January 2008 | 15 August 2017 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 12 |
| Threads | 2 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 25 Watt |
Atom C3808 has a 240% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 40% lower power consumption.
The Intel Atom C3808 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 in performance tests.
Be aware that Core 2 Duo T9300 is a notebook processor while Atom C3808 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
