Processor N95 vs Core 2 Duo T8100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo T8100 and Processor N95 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated1522
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Alder Lake-N
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Alder Lake-N
Release date10 January 2008 (16 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$209no data
Current price$63 (0.3x MSRP)no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo T8100 and Processor N95 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads244 x 3.4  GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
Base clock speed2.1 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus support800 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data96 KB (per core)
L2 cache3 MB2 MB (shared)
L3 cache3 MB L2 Cache6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm10 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range1V-1.25Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T8100 and Processor N95 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA479,PGA478Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T8100 and Processor N95. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NIno data+
FMAno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo T8100 and Processor N95 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T8100 and Processor N95 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo T8100 and Processor N95. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4, DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo T8100 and Processor N95.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Core 2 Duo T8100 2320
Processor N95 4783
+106%

Processor N95 outperforms Core 2 Duo T8100 by 106% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Core 2 Duo T8100 4282
Processor N95 13854
+224%

Processor N95 outperforms Core 2 Duo T8100 by 224% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Core 2 Duo T8100 1878
Processor N95 5952
+217%

Processor N95 outperforms Core 2 Duo T8100 by 217% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Core 2 Duo T8100 37.5
Processor N95 17.04
+120%

Core 2 Duo T8100 outperforms Processor N95 by 120% in wPrime 32.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 January 2008 3 January 2023
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 44 x 3.4 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
Chip lithography 45 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo T8100 and Processor N95. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T8100 and Processor N95, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo T8100
Core 2 Duo T8100
Intel Processor N95
Processor N95

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 74 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T8100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 485 votes

Rate Processor N95 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo T8100 or Processor N95, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.