Embedded G-Series T52R vs Core 2 Duo T8100
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3225 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.01 | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Duo | AMD Embedded G-Series |
| Power efficiency | 0.54 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Bobcat |
| Release date | 10 January 2008 (18 years ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $209 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Core 2 Duo T8100 and Embedded G-Series T52R: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.1 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| Multiplier | no data | 15 |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 3 MB L2 Cache | no data |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 40 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 75 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | 451 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| VID voltage range | 1V-1.25V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo T8100 and Embedded G-Series T52R compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | BGA479,PGA478 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 18 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T8100 and Embedded G-Series T52R. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo T8100 and Embedded G-Series T52R technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T8100 and Embedded G-Series T52R are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo T8100 and Embedded G-Series T52R. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 10.67 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon HD 6310 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 18 Watt |
Core 2 Duo T8100 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Embedded G-Series T52R, on the other hand, has a 13% more advanced lithography process, and 94% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 and AMD Embedded G-Series T52R. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
