Opteron 842 vs Core 2 Duo T7700
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Duo T7700 and Opteron 842 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2812 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Duo | no data |
| Power efficiency | 1.65 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | SledgeHammer (2003−2005) |
| Release date | 2 September 2007 (17 years ago) | June 2003 (21 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $307 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo T7700 and Opteron 842 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | 193 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 291 Million | 106 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo T7700 and Opteron 842 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 8 |
| Socket | PBGA479,PPGA478 | 940 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 85 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T7700 and Opteron 842. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo T7700 and Opteron 842 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T7700 and Opteron 842 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 85 Watt |
Core 2 Duo T7700 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 142.9% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo T7700 and Opteron 842. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Core 2 Duo T7700 is a notebook processor while Opteron 842 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T7700 and Opteron 842, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
