A6-4455M vs Core 2 Duo T7700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo T7700
2007
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.61
+19.6%

Core 2 Duo T7700 outperforms A6-4455M by a significant 20% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo T7700 and A6-4455M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking26772757
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoAMD A-Series
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Trinity (2012−2013)
Release date2 September 2007 (16 years ago)15 May 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$307no data
Current price$143 (0.5x MSRP)$449

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo T7700 and A6-4455M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus support800 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB92 KB
L2 cache4 MB2 MB (shared)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm32 nm
Die size143 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data100 °C
Number of transistors291 Million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T7700 and A6-4455M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPBGA479,PPGA478FP2
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T7700 and A6-4455M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NIno data+
FMAno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo T7700 and A6-4455M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T7700 and A6-4455M are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo T7700 and A6-4455M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataunknown Dual-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 7500G

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo T7700 0.61
+19.6%
A6-4455M 0.51

Core 2 Duo T7700 outperforms A6-4455M by 20% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core 2 Duo T7700 945
+19.2%
A6-4455M 793

Core 2 Duo T7700 outperforms A6-4455M by 19% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core 2 Duo T7700 253
+15.5%
A6-4455M 219

Core 2 Duo T7700 outperforms A6-4455M by 16% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core 2 Duo T7700 405
+35%
A6-4455M 300

Core 2 Duo T7700 outperforms A6-4455M by 35% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Core 2 Duo T7700 2554
+51.2%
A6-4455M 1689

Core 2 Duo T7700 outperforms A6-4455M by 51% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Core 2 Duo T7700 4620
+77.6%
A6-4455M 2601

Core 2 Duo T7700 outperforms A6-4455M by 78% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Core 2 Duo T7700 2058
+51.5%
A6-4455M 1359

Core 2 Duo T7700 outperforms A6-4455M by 51% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.61 0.51
Recency 2 September 2007 15 May 2012
Chip lithography 65 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 17 Watt

The Core 2 Duo T7700 is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-4455M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T7700 and A6-4455M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo T7700
Core 2 Duo T7700
AMD A6-4455M
A6-4455M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 79 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 42 votes

Rate A6-4455M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo T7700 or A6-4455M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.