EPYC 7502 vs Core 2 Duo T7500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo T7500
2007
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.53
EPYC 7502
2019
32 cores / 64 threads, 180 Watt
31.02
+5753%

EPYC 7502 outperforms Core 2 Duo T7500 by a whopping 5753% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo T7500 and EPYC 7502 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2748119
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data7.41
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date8 May 2007 (17 years ago)7 August 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$234$2,600
Current price$62 (0.3x MSRP)$3299 (1.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo T7500 and EPYC 7502 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads264
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz3.35 GHz
Bus support800 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size143 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors291 Million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes
VID voltage range1.075V - 1.25Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T7500 and EPYC 7502 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12 (Multiprocessor)
SocketPBGA479,PPGA478TR4
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T7500 and EPYC 7502. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo T7500 and EPYC 7502 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T7500 and EPYC 7502 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo T7500 and EPYC 7502. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.763 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo T7500 0.53
EPYC 7502 31.02
+5753%

EPYC 7502 outperforms Core 2 Duo T7500 by 5753% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core 2 Duo T7500 824
EPYC 7502 47983
+5723%

EPYC 7502 outperforms Core 2 Duo T7500 by 5723% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.53 31.02
Recency 8 May 2007 7 August 2019
Physical cores 2 32
Threads 2 64
Cost $234 $2600
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 180 Watt

The EPYC 7502 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo T7500 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core 2 Duo T7500 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7502 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T7500 and EPYC 7502, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo T7500
Core 2 Duo T7500
AMD EPYC 7502
EPYC 7502

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 177 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 6 votes

Rate EPYC 7502 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo T7500 or EPYC 7502, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.