Core i3-4100E vs Core 2 Duo T7500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo T7500
2007, $234
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.47
Core i3-4100E
2013, $225
2 cores / 4 threads, 37 Watt
1.06
+126%

Core i3-4100E outperforms Core 2 Duo T7500 by a whopping 126% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32062695
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.010.07
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core i3
Power efficiency0.571.21
DesignerIntelIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Haswell (2013−2015)
Release date8 May 2007 (19 years ago)4 September 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$234$225

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i3-4100E has 600% better value for money than Core 2 Duo T7500.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Core 2 Duo T7500 and Core i3-4100E: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm22 nm
Die size143 mm2118 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors291 Million1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.075V - 1.25Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T7500 and Core i3-4100E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPBGA479,PPGA478Intel BGA1364
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt37 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T7500 and Core i3-4100E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo T7500 and Core i3-4100E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T7500 and Core i3-4100E are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo T7500 and Core i3-4100E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 4600 (400 - 900 MHz)

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Core 2 Duo T7500 0.47
i3-4100E 1.06
+126%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Core 2 Duo T7500 829
Samples: 1006
i3-4100E 1848
+123%
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.47 1.06
Recency 8 May 2007 4 September 2013
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 65 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 37 Watt

Core 2 Duo T7500 has 6% lower power consumption.

i3-4100E, on the other hand, has a 126% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more threads, and a 195% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Core i3-4100E is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 204 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 4 votes

Rate Core i3-4100E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core 2 Duo T7500 and Core i3-4100E, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.