Atom Z612 vs Core 2 Duo T7500
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Duo T7500 and Atom Z612 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2857 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Duo | Intel Atom |
| Power efficiency | 1.40 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Lincroft (2010−2011) |
| Release date | 8 May 2007 (17 years ago) | 4 May 2010 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $234 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo T7500 and Atom Z612 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 0.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 900 MHz - 1500 MHz (1 core) |
| Bus type | no data | cDMI |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | 400 MT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 9 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 56 KB |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | 65.2526 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 291 Million | 140 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 1.075V - 1.25V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo T7500 and Atom Z612 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | PBGA479,PPGA478 | Intel BGA 518 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 1.3 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T7500 and Atom Z612. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo T7500 and Atom Z612 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T7500 and Atom Z612 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo T7500 and Atom Z612. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR1, DDR2 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 2 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 1 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 3.2 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | PowerVR SGX535 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 8 May 2007 | 4 May 2010 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 1 Watt |
Core 2 Duo T7500 has 100% more physical cores.
Atom Z612, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 3400% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo T7500 and Atom Z612. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T7500 and Atom Z612, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
