Ryzen Threadripper 1940 vs Core 2 Duo T7300
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3282 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.01 | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Duo | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.50 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 27 July 2006 (19 years ago) | 29 July 2017 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $234 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Core 2 Duo T7300 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 28 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 32 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | 213 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 293 million | 9,600 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo T7300 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | PBGA479,PPGA478 | SP3r2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 180 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T7300 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo T7300 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T7300 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo T7300 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 Quad-channel |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 27 July 2006 | 29 July 2017 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 14 |
| Threads | 2 | 28 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 180 Watt |
Core 2 Duo T7300 has 414% lower power consumption.
Ryzen Threadripper 1940, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, 600% more physical cores and 1300% more threads, and a 364% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1940. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Core 2 Duo T7300 is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper 1940 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
