Duron 1800 vs Core 2 Duo T7300
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3204 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.01 | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Duo | AMD Duron |
| Power efficiency | 0.50 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | K7 (2000−2004) |
| Release date | 9 May 2007 (18 years ago) | 15 August 2003 (22 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $234 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo T7300 and Duron 1800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | FSB |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | 266.66 MT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 13.5 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 64 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | 80.89 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 291 Million | 37 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo T7300 and Duron 1800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | PBGA479,PPGA478 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 57 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T7300 and Duron 1800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo T7300 and Duron 1800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T7300 and Duron 1800 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo T7300 and Duron 1800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 GB |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 9 May 2007 | 15 August 2003 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 57 Watt |
Core 2 Duo T7300 has an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 62.9% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 and AMD Duron 1800. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Core 2 Duo T7300 is a notebook processor while Duron 1800 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
