AMD EPYC 9654 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7250

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

General info

Comparing Core 2 Duo T7250 and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated4
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for moneyno data11.94
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Genoa
Release date2 August 2007 (16 years old)10 November 2022 (1 year old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,805
Current price$62 $3975 (0.3x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Technical specs

Core 2 Duo T7250 and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)96
Threads2192
Base clock speed2 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus support800 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size143 mm212x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors291 Million78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range1.075V-1.175Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T7250 and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketPBGA479,PPGA478SP5
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T7250 and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo T7250 and EPYC 9654 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T7250 and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo T7250 and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data460.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo T7250 and EPYC 9654.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core 2 Duo T7250 705
EPYC 9654 122091
+17218%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Core 2 Duo T7250 by 17218% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core 2 Duo T7250 203
EPYC 9654 1884
+828%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Core 2 Duo T7250 by 828% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core 2 Duo T7250 322
EPYC 9654 19322
+5901%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Core 2 Duo T7250 by 5901% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Advantages and disadvantages


Recency 2 August 2007 10 November 2022
Physical cores 2 96
Threads 2 192
Chip lithography 65 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 360 Watt

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo T7250 and EPYC 9654. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Core 2 Duo T7250 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9654 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T7250 and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo T7250
Core 2 Duo T7250
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 89 votes

Rate Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 978 votes

Rate AMD EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo T7250 or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.