Xeon Gold 5420+ vs Core 2 Duo T7200
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Gold 5420+ outperforms Core 2 Duo T7200 by a whopping 7786% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3155 | 128 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.01 | 19.66 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Duo | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.52 | 6.83 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 28 July 2006 (19 years ago) | 10 January 2023 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $286 | $1,848 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon Gold 5420+ has 196500% better value for money than Core 2 Duo T7200.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo T7200 and Xeon Gold 5420+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 28 (Octacosa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 56 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| Bus rate | 667 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 52.5 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 84 °C |
| Number of transistors | 291 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| VID voltage range | 1.0375V-1.3V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo T7200 and Xeon Gold 5420+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | PPGA478, PBGA479 | 4677 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 34 Watt | 205 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T7200 and Xeon Gold 5420+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo T7200 and Xeon Gold 5420+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T7200 and Xeon Gold 5420+ are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo T7200 and Xeon Gold 5420+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5-4400 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo T7200 and Xeon Gold 5420+.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 80 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.42 | 33.12 |
| Recency | 28 July 2006 | 10 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 28 |
| Threads | 2 | 56 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 34 Watt | 205 Watt |
Core 2 Duo T7200 has 502.9% lower power consumption.
Xeon Gold 5420+, on the other hand, has a 7785.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, 1300% more physical cores and 2700% more threads, and a 550% more advanced lithography process.
The Intel Xeon Gold 5420+ is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 in performance tests.
Be aware that Core 2 Duo T7200 is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 5420+ is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
