Athlon X2 L310 vs Core 2 Duo T7200

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo T7200
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 34 Watt
0.46
+119%
Athlon X2 L310
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 13 Watt
0.21

Core 2 Duo T7200 outperforms Athlon X2 L310 by a whopping 119% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo T7200 and Athlon X2 L310 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29333216
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 Duo2x AMD Athlon
Power efficiency1.291.54
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Conesus (2009)
Release date28 July 2006 (18 years ago)10 September 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$286no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo T7200 and Athlon X2 L310 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2 GHz1.2 GHz
Bus rate667 MHz800 MHz
L1 cache64 KB256 KB
L2 cache4 MB1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Die size143 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
Number of transistors291 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.0375V-1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T7200 and Athlon X2 L310 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketPPGA478, PBGA479BGA / 638 lidless micro-PGA
Power consumption (TDP)34 Watt13 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T7200 and Athlon X2 L310. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Virtualization, Enhanced Virus Protection
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo T7200 and Athlon X2 L310 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T7200 and Athlon X2 L310 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo T7200 0.46
+119%
Athlon X2 L310 0.21

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo T7200 744
+122%
Athlon X2 L310 335

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Core 2 Duo T7200 209
+80.2%
Athlon X2 L310 116

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Core 2 Duo T7200 329
+65.3%
Athlon X2 L310 199

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Duo T7200 1717
+98.3%
Athlon X2 L310 866

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.46 0.21
Recency 28 July 2006 10 September 2009
Power consumption (TDP) 34 Watt 13 Watt

Core 2 Duo T7200 has a 119% higher aggregate performance score.

Athlon X2 L310, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and 161.5% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Duo T7200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon X2 L310 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T7200 and Athlon X2 L310, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo T7200
Core 2 Duo T7200
AMD Athlon X2 L310
Athlon X2 L310

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 109 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T7200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 12 votes

Rate Athlon X2 L310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo T7200 or Athlon X2 L310, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.