Core 2 Duo SL9400 vs Core 2 Duo T6570

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo T6570
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.48
Core 2 Duo SL9400
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.48

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo T6570 and Core 2 Duo SL9400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29132914
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
Power efficiency1.292.66
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years ago)20 August 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$284

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo T6570 and Core 2 Duo SL9400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.1 GHz1.86 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz1.86 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz1066 MHz
L2 cache2 MB6 MB
L3 cache2 MB6 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size107 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Number of transistors410 Million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1V-1.25V1.05V - 1.15V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T6570 and Core 2 Duo SL9400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPGA478BGA956
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T6570 and Core 2 Duo SL9400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo T6570 and Core 2 Duo SL9400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T6570 and Core 2 Duo SL9400 are enumerated here.

VT-x++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo T6570 0.48
Core 2 Duo SL9400 0.48

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo T6570 759
Core 2 Duo SL9400 759

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Core 2 Duo T6570 2274
+6.1%
Core 2 Duo SL9400 2144

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Core 2 Duo T6570 4276
+11.1%
Core 2 Duo SL9400 3850

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Duo T6570 1820
+40%
Core 2 Duo SL9400 1300

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Core 2 Duo T6570 36.83
+17.1%
Core 2 Duo SL9400 43.12

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Core 2 Duo T6570 1
+9.9%
Core 2 Duo SL9400 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 2009 20 August 2008
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 17 Watt

Core 2 Duo T6570 has an age advantage of 4 months.

Core 2 Duo SL9400, on the other hand, has 105.9% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core 2 Duo T6570 and Core 2 Duo SL9400.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T6570 and Core 2 Duo SL9400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo T6570
Core 2 Duo T6570
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400
Core 2 Duo SL9400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 58 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T6570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 4 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo SL9400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo T6570 or Core 2 Duo SL9400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.