Athlon X2 QL-66 vs Core 2 Duo T6500

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo T6500
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.47
+17.5%
Athlon X2 QL-66
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.40

Core 2 Duo T6500 outperforms Athlon X2 QL-66 by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo T6500 and Athlon X2 QL-66 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29283002
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 Duo2x AMD Athlon
Power efficiency1.271.08
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Lion (2008−2009)
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years ago)1 September 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo T6500 and Athlon X2 QL-66 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz3600 MHz
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cache2 MB1 MB
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T6500 and Athlon X2 QL-66 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPGA478S1g2
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T6500 and Athlon X2 QL-66. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization
PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo T6500 and Athlon X2 QL-66 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T6500 and Athlon X2 QL-66 are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo T6500 0.47
+17.5%
Athlon X2 QL-66 0.40

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo T6500 747
+16.5%
Athlon X2 QL-66 641

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Core 2 Duo T6500 2249
+32.7%
Athlon X2 QL-66 1695

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Core 2 Duo T6500 4262
+28.4%
Athlon X2 QL-66 3320

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Duo T6500 1879
+23.6%
Athlon X2 QL-66 1520

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.47 0.40
Recency 1 January 2009 1 September 2009
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm

Core 2 Duo T6500 has a 17.5% higher aggregate performance score, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon X2 QL-66, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months.

The Core 2 Duo T6500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon X2 QL-66 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T6500 and Athlon X2 QL-66, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo T6500
Core 2 Duo T6500
AMD Athlon X2 QL-66
Athlon X2 QL-66

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 88 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T6500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 16 votes

Rate Athlon X2 QL-66 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo T6500 or Athlon X2 QL-66, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.