Core 2 Duo T5870 vs Core 2 Duo T5850

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

General info

Comparing Core 2 Duo T5850 and Core 2 Duo T5870 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Merom (2006−2008)
Release date1 October 2008 (15 years ago)1 October 2008 (15 years ago)
Current price$9.28 $194

Technical specs

Core 2 Duo T5850 and Core 2 Duo T5870 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz2 GHz
Bus support667 MHz800 MHz
L2 cache2 MB2 MB
L3 cacheno data2 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Die sizeno data143 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistorsno data291 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage rangeno data1.075V-1.175V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T5850 and Core 2 Duo T5870 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Power consumption (TDP)34 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T5850 and Core 2 Duo T5870. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo T5850 and Core 2 Duo T5870 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T5850 and Core 2 Duo T5870 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core 2 Duo T5850 687
Core 2 Duo T5870 698
+1.6%

Core 2 Duo T5870 outperforms Core 2 Duo T5850 by 2% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core 2 Duo T5850 267
+17.1%
Core 2 Duo T5870 228

Core 2 Duo T5850 outperforms Core 2 Duo T5870 by 17% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core 2 Duo T5850 467
+24.2%
Core 2 Duo T5870 376

Core 2 Duo T5850 outperforms Core 2 Duo T5870 by 24% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Core 2 Duo T5850 2161
+3.5%
Core 2 Duo T5870 2089

Core 2 Duo T5850 outperforms Core 2 Duo T5870 by 3% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Core 2 Duo T5850 3997
+4.9%
Core 2 Duo T5870 3810

Core 2 Duo T5850 outperforms Core 2 Duo T5870 by 5% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Core 2 Duo T5850 1768
+8.6%
Core 2 Duo T5870 1628

Core 2 Duo T5850 outperforms Core 2 Duo T5870 by 9% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Advantages and disadvantages


Power consumption (TDP) 34 Watt 35 Watt

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo T5850 and Core 2 Duo T5870. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T5850 and Core 2 Duo T5870, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo T5850
Core 2 Duo T5850
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870
Core 2 Duo T5870

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 22 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T5850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 25 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T5870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo T5850 or Core 2 Duo T5870, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.