Apple M1 Max vs Core 2 Duo T5750
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Duo T5750 and Apple M1 Max processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 643 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Duo | Apple M-Series |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | no data |
| Release date | 1 May 2008 (16 years ago) | 18 October 2021 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo T5750 and Apple M1 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 10 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.06 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.22 GHz |
| Bus support | 667 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 2.9 MB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 28 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 48 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 85 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 291 Million | 57000 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo T5750 and Apple M1 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | PPGA478 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 34 Watt | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 May 2008 | 18 October 2021 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 10 |
| Threads | 2 | 10 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 5 nm |
Apple M1 Max has an age advantage of 13 years, 400% more physical cores and 400% more threads, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo T5750 and Apple M1 Max. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T5750 and Apple M1 Max, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
