Pentium D 840 vs Core 2 Duo T5470

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo T5470 and Pentium D 840 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3039not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesCore 2 Duono data
Power efficiency1.00no data
Architecture codenameMerom-2048 (2006−2008)Smithfield (2005)
Release dateno dataMay 2005 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo T5470 and Pentium D 840 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.6 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data28 KB
L2 cacheno data2 MB
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm90 nm
Die sizeno data206 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C70 °C
Number of transistorsno data169 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.075V-1.25V1.2V-1.4V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T5470 and Pentium D 840 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketPPGA478PLGA775
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T5470 and Pentium D 840. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switching--
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parity--

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo T5470 and Pentium D 840 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T5470 and Pentium D 840 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x--

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo T5470 and Pentium D 840. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 65 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 130 Watt

Core 2 Duo T5470 has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 271.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo T5470 and Pentium D 840. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Core 2 Duo T5470 is a notebook processor while Pentium D 840 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T5470 and Pentium D 840, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo T5470
Core 2 Duo T5470
Intel Pentium D 840
Pentium D 840

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 14 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T5470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 9 votes

Rate Pentium D 840 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo T5470 or Pentium D 840, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.