Athlon II M300 vs Core 2 Duo T5470
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Duo T5470 and Athlon II M300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Core 2 Duo | AMD Athlon II |
Architecture codename | Merom-2048 (2006−2008) | Caspian (2009) |
Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | 10 September 2009 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo T5470 and Athlon II M300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 2 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2 GHz |
Bus rate | 800 MHz | 3200 MHz |
L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
L2 cache | no data | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 2 MB L2 Cache | no data |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
VID voltage range | 1.075V-1.25V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo T5470 and Athlon II M300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Socket | PPGA478 | Socket S1 (S1g3) |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T5470 and Athlon II M300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization |
PowerNow | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo T5470 and Athlon II M300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T5470 and Athlon II M300 are enumerated here.
VT-x | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo T5470 and Athlon II M300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR2 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Pros & cons summary
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
Athlon II M300 has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo T5470 and Athlon II M300. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T5470 and Athlon II M300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.