Atom Z3770 vs Core 2 Duo T5300
Aggregate performance score
Atom Z3770 outperforms Core 2 Duo T5300 by a substantial 39% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Duo T5300 and Atom Z3770 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3087 | 2936 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Core 2 Duo | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.92 | 5.47 |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) |
| Release date | no data | 27 September 2013 (11 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $37 |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo T5300 and Atom Z3770 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 1.73 GHz | 1.46 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.73 GHz | 2.39 GHz |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 2 MB L2 Cache | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 90 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo T5300 and Atom Z3770 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | PPGA478 | UTFCBGA1380 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 34 Watt | 8 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T5300 and Atom Z3770. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo T5300 and Atom Z3770 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| Identity Protection | - | + |
| Anti-Theft | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T5300 and Atom Z3770 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo T5300 and Atom Z3770. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 17.1 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series |
| Quick Sync Video | - | + |
| Clear Video HD | no data | + |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 667 MHz |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.33 | 0.46 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 34 Watt | 8 Watt |
Atom Z3770 has a 39.4% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 195.5% more advanced lithography process, and 325% lower power consumption.
The Atom Z3770 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo T5300 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T5300 and Atom Z3770, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
