Ryzen 3 3350U vs Core 2 Duo SU7300
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 3 3350U outperforms Core 2 Duo SU7300 by a whopping 946% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Ryzen 3 3350U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 3061 | 1499 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Core 2 Duo | Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) |
Power efficiency | 3.31 | 23.09 |
Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
Release date | 1 September 2009 (15 years ago) | 6 January 2019 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Ryzen 3 3350U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | no data | 384 KB |
L2 cache | 3 MB | 2 MB |
L3 cache | 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache | 4 MB |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 12 nm |
Die size | 107 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 105 °C |
Number of transistors | 410 Million | 4500 Million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Ryzen 3 3350U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Socket | BGA956 | AM4 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Ryzen 3 3350U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1 | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Ryzen 3 3350U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Ryzen 3 3350U are enumerated here.
VT-x | + | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.35 | 3.66 |
Recency | 1 September 2009 | 6 January 2019 |
Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
Threads | 2 | 4 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 12 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 15 Watt |
Core 2 Duo SU7300 has 50% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 3 3350U, on the other hand, has a 945.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.
The Ryzen 3 3350U is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo SU7300 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Ryzen 3 3350U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.