Processor N97 vs Core 2 Duo SU7300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Processor N97 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated1499
Place by popularitynot in top-10051
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 Duono data
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Alder Lake-N
Release date1 September 2009 (14 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Current price$280 no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Processor N97 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads244 x 3.6  GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
Base clock speed1.3 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.3 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus support800 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data96 KB (per core)
L2 cache3 MB2 MB (shared)
L3 cache3 MB Intel® Smart Cache6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm10 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Processor N97 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA956Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt12 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Processor N97. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1no data
AES-NI-+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Processor N97 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Processor N97 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Processor N97. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4, DDR54800 MHz Single-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Processor N97.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Core 2 Duo SU7300 1496
Processor N97 5445
+264%

Processor N97 outperforms Core 2 Duo SU7300 by 264% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Core 2 Duo SU7300 2813
Processor N97 15323
+445%

Processor N97 outperforms Core 2 Duo SU7300 by 445% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Core 2 Duo SU7300 1178
Processor N97 6461
+448%

Processor N97 outperforms Core 2 Duo SU7300 by 448% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Core 2 Duo SU7300 61.3
Processor N97 16.82
+264%

Core 2 Duo SU7300 outperforms Processor N97 by 264% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Core 2 Duo SU7300 1
Processor N97 6
+675%

Processor N97 outperforms Core 2 Duo SU7300 by 675% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Core 2 Duo SU7300 72
Processor N97 479
+563%

Processor N97 outperforms Core 2 Duo SU7300 by 563% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Core 2 Duo SU7300 39
Processor N97 161
+316%

Processor N97 outperforms Core 2 Duo SU7300 by 316% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Core 2 Duo SU7300 0.1
Processor N97 2.9
+2800%

Processor N97 outperforms Core 2 Duo SU7300 by 2800% in TrueCrypt AES.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2009 3 January 2023
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 44 x 3.6 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
Chip lithography 45 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 12 Watt

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Processor N97. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Processor N97, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300
Core 2 Duo SU7300
Intel Processor N97
Processor N97

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 41 vote

Rate Core 2 Duo SU7300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 96 votes

Rate Processor N97 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo SU7300 or Processor N97, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.