Pentium M 738 vs Core 2 Duo SU7300
Aggregate performance score
Core 2 Duo SU7300 outperforms Pentium M 738 by a whopping 167% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3339 | 3622 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Duo | Pentium M |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Dothan (2004−2005) |
| Release date | 1 September 2009 (16 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Pentium M 738 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 1.3 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | 400 MHz |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache | no data |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Pentium M 738 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | BGA956 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 2 MB |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Pentium M 738. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1 | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Pentium M 738 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Pentium M 738 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.32 | 0.12 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 2 Watt |
Core 2 Duo SU7300 has a 166.7% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
Pentium M 738, on the other hand, has 400% lower power consumption.
The Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Pentium M 738 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
