Celeron Dual-Core T3300 vs Core 2 Duo SU7300
Aggregate performance score
Celeron Dual-Core T3300 outperforms Core 2 Duo SU7300 by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 3060 | 3006 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Core 2 Duo | Intel Celeron Dual-Core |
Power efficiency | 3.31 | 1.08 |
Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
Release date | 1 September 2009 (15 years ago) | 1 February 2010 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 2 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 1.3 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 2 GHz |
Bus rate | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 3 MB | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache | no data |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 45 nm |
Die size | 107 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 410 Million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Socket | BGA956 | Socket P 478 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1 | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 are enumerated here.
VT-x | + | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.35 | 0.40 |
Recency | 1 September 2009 | 1 February 2010 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 35 Watt |
Core 2 Duo SU7300 has 250% lower power consumption.
Celeron Dual-Core T3300, on the other hand, has a 14.3% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 5 months.
The Celeron Dual-Core T3300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo SU7300 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.