Atom N270 vs Core 2 Duo SU7300

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo SU7300
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.35
+289%
Atom N270
2008
1 core / 2 threads, 2 Watt
0.09

Core 2 Duo SU7300 outperforms Atom N270 by a whopping 289% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Atom N270 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30613395
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Atom
Power efficiency3.313.41
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)DiamondVille (2008−2009)
Release date1 September 2009 (15 years ago)2 April 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$44

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Atom N270 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.3 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.3 GHz0.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rate800 MHz533.33 MT/s
Multiplierno data12
L1 cacheno data56 KB
L2 cache3 MB512 KB
L3 cache3 MB Intel® Smart Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size107 mm225.9638 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C90 °C
Number of transistors410 Million47 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.9V-1.1625V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Atom N270 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketBGA956PBGA437
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt2.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Atom N270. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1Intel® SSE, Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle Statesno data-
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switching--
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Atom N270 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Atom N270 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Atom N270. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo SU7300 0.35
+289%
Atom N270 0.09

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Core 2 Duo SU7300 1496
+177%
Atom N270 541

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Core 2 Duo SU7300 2813
+239%
Atom N270 830

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Duo SU7300 1178
+144%
Atom N270 483

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Core 2 Duo SU7300 61.3
+106%
Atom N270 126

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.35 0.09
Recency 1 September 2009 2 April 2008
Physical cores 2 1
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 2 Watt

Core 2 Duo SU7300 has a 288.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 100% more physical cores.

Atom N270, on the other hand, has 400% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Duo SU7300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom N270 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Atom N270, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300
Core 2 Duo SU7300
Intel Atom N270
Atom N270

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 42 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo SU7300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 252 votes

Rate Atom N270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo SU7300 or Atom N270, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.