Athlon X4 730 vs Core 2 Duo SU7300
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Athlon X4 730 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 2178 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
Series | Intel Core 2 Duo | no data |
Power efficiency | no data | 2.09 |
Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Trinity (2012−2013) |
Release date | 1 September 2009 (15 years ago) | 2 October 2012 (12 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Athlon X4 730 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | no data | 192K |
L2 cache | 3 MB | 4 MB (shared) |
L3 cache | 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache | no data |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
Die size | 107 mm2 | 246 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 74 °C |
Number of transistors | 410 Million | 1,303 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Athlon X4 730 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | BGA956 | FM2 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Athlon X4 730. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1 | no data |
AES-NI | - | + |
FMA | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Athlon X4 730 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Athlon X4 730 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Athlon X4 730. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR3-1866 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Athlon X4 730.
PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 1 September 2009 | 2 October 2012 |
Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
Threads | 2 | 4 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 65 Watt |
Core 2 Duo SU7300 has 550% lower power consumption.
Athlon X4 730, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Athlon X4 730. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Core 2 Duo SU7300 is a notebook processor while Athlon X4 730 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Athlon X4 730, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.