Athlon Neo X2 L335 vs Core 2 Duo SU7300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Athlon Neo X2 L335 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 Duo2x AMD Athlon Neo
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Congo (2009)
Release date1 September 2009 (14 years ago)1 October 2009 (14 years ago)
Current price$280 no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Athlon Neo X2 L335 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.3 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus support800 MHz800 MHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache3 MB512 KB
L3 cache3 MB Intel® Smart Cacheno data
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C95 °C
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Athlon Neo X2 L335 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGA956ASB1 BGA
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Athlon Neo X2 L335. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1HT 3.0, 128-Bit DDR2 Memory Controller, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization
AES-NI-no data
VirusProtectno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Athlon Neo X2 L335 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Athlon Neo X2 L335 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Athlon Neo X2 L335. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Core 2 Duo SU7300 1496
+12.4%
Athlon Neo X2 L335 1331

Core 2 Duo SU7300 outperforms Athlon Neo X2 L335 by 12% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Core 2 Duo SU7300 2813
+9.7%
Athlon Neo X2 L335 2565

Core 2 Duo SU7300 outperforms Athlon Neo X2 L335 by 10% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Core 2 Duo SU7300 1178
+2%
Athlon Neo X2 L335 1155

Core 2 Duo SU7300 outperforms Athlon Neo X2 L335 by 2% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Core 2 Duo SU7300 61.3
+60.7%
Athlon Neo X2 L335 98.5

Athlon Neo X2 L335 outperforms Core 2 Duo SU7300 by 61% in wPrime 32.

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 18 Watt

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Athlon Neo X2 L335. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Athlon Neo X2 L335, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300
Core 2 Duo SU7300
AMD Athlon Neo X2 L335
Athlon Neo X2 L335

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 40 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo SU7300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 3 votes

Rate Athlon Neo X2 L335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo SU7300 or Athlon Neo X2 L335, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.