E2-9000 vs Core 2 Duo SP9400

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo SP9400
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 25 Watt
0.54
E2-9000
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.61
+13%

E2-9000 outperforms Core 2 Duo SP9400 by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo SP9400 and E2-9000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28502802
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoBristol Ridge
Power efficiency2.055.78
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date20 August 2008 (16 years ago)1 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$284no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo SP9400 and E2-9000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.4 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHzno data
L2 cache6 MB1 MB
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Die size107 mm2124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C90 °C
Number of transistors410 Million1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo SP9400 and E2-9000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGA956BGA
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo SP9400 and E2-9000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataVirtualization,
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo SP9400 and E2-9000 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo SP9400 and E2-9000 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo SP9400 and E2-9000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 600 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo SP9400 0.54
E2-9000 0.61
+13%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo SP9400 863
E2-9000 967
+12.1%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Core 2 Duo SP9400 2083
+16.6%
E2-9000 1787

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Core 2 Duo SP9400 3950
+36.3%
E2-9000 2897

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Duo SP9400 2059
+32.3%
E2-9000 1556

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.54 0.61
Recency 20 August 2008 1 June 2016
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 10 Watt

E2-9000 has a 13% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

The E2-9000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo SP9400 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo SP9400 and E2-9000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400
Core 2 Duo SP9400
AMD E2-9000
E2-9000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo SP9400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 314 votes

Rate E2-9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo SP9400 or E2-9000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.