Processor N97 vs Core 2 Duo SL9600

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo SL9600
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.48
Processor N97
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
3.45
+619%

Processor N97 outperforms Core 2 Duo SL9600 by a whopping 619% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo SL9600 and Processor N97 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28981545
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 Duono data
Power efficiency2.6727.21
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release date1 March 2009 (15 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$316no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo SL9600 and Processor N97 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.13 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.13 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache6 MB2 MB (shared)
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cache6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm10 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range1.05V-1.15Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo SL9600 and Processor N97 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA956Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt12 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo SL9600 and Processor N97. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo SL9600 and Processor N97 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo SL9600 and Processor N97 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo SL9600 and Processor N97. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) ( - 1200 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo SL9600 and Processor N97.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo SL9600 0.48
Processor N97 3.45
+619%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Core 2 Duo SL9600 2054
Processor N97 5445
+165%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Core 2 Duo SL9600 3281
Processor N97 15323
+367%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Core 2 Duo SL9600 43.1
Processor N97 16.82
+156%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.48 3.45
Recency 1 March 2009 3 January 2023
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 12 Watt

Processor N97 has a 618.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 350% more advanced lithography process, and 41.7% lower power consumption.

The Processor N97 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo SL9600 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo SL9600 and Processor N97, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600
Core 2 Duo SL9600
Intel Processor N97
Processor N97

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 7 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo SL9600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 190 votes

Rate Processor N97 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo SL9600 or Processor N97, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.