E-300 vs Core 2 Duo P9700

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

General info

Comparing Core 2 Duo P9700 and E-300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2544not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoAMD E-Series
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Zacate (2011−2013)
Release date1 April 2009 (15 years ago)22 August 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$348no data
Current price$70 (0.2x MSRP)$200

Technical specs

Core 2 Duo P9700 and E-300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz1.3 GHz
Bus support1066 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache6 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm40 nm
Die size107 mm275 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range1.012V-1.175Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo P9700 and E-300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPGA478FT1
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo P9700 and E-300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataDDR3-1066 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 2 [?], MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SVM
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo P9700 and E-300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo P9700 and E-300 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo P9700 and E-300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 6310

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core 2 Duo P9700 1131
+234%
E-300 339

Core 2 Duo P9700 outperforms E-300 by 234% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core 2 Duo P9700 374
+373%
E-300 79

Core 2 Duo P9700 outperforms E-300 by 373% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core 2 Duo P9700 634
+391%
E-300 129

Core 2 Duo P9700 outperforms E-300 by 391% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Core 2 Duo P9700 3425
+302%
E-300 853

Core 2 Duo P9700 outperforms E-300 by 302% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Core 2 Duo P9700 6133
+422%
E-300 1176

Core 2 Duo P9700 outperforms E-300 by 422% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Core 2 Duo P9700 2540
+203%
E-300 839

Core 2 Duo P9700 outperforms E-300 by 203% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Core 2 Duo P9700 54.6
+44.7%
E-300 79

E-300 outperforms Core 2 Duo P9700 by 45% in wPrime 32.

Advantages and disadvantages


Recency 1 April 2009 22 August 2011
Chip lithography 45 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 18 Watt

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo P9700 and E-300. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo P9700 and E-300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo P9700
Core 2 Duo P9700
AMD E-300
E-300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 38 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo P9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 232 votes

Rate E-300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo P9700 or E-300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.