Athlon 64 FX-62 vs Core 2 Duo P8800
Aggregate performance score
Athlon 64 FX-62 outperforms Core 2 Duo P8800 by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3100 | 3073 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.02 | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Duo | Athlon 64 (Desktop) |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Windsor (2006−2007) |
| Release date | 1 April 2009 (16 years ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $241 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo P8800 and Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.66 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.66 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1066 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 3 MB L2 Cache | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 220 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | 243 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 1V-1.25V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo P8800 and Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | BGA479,PGA478 | AM2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 2 MB |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo P8800 and Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo P8800 and Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo P8800 and Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo P8800 and Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR1 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.53 | 0.56 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 2 Watt |
Core 2 Duo P8800 has a 100% more advanced lithography process.
Athlon 64 FX-62, on the other hand, has a 5.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 1150% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 and AMD Athlon 64 FX-62.
Be aware that Core 2 Duo P8800 is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 FX-62 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
