A6-7000 vs Core 2 Duo P8800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo P8800
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 25 Watt
0.61

A6-7000 outperforms Core 2 Duo P8800 by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo P8800 and A6-7000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking26822651
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoAMD Kaveri
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release date1 April 2009 (15 years ago)1 June 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$241no data
Current price$66 (0.3x MSRP)$450

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo P8800 and A6-7000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.66 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.66 GHz3 GHz
Bus support1066 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache3 MB1024 KB
L3 cache3 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range1V-1.25Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo P8800 and A6-7000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGA479,PGA478FT3
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo P8800 and A6-7000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1600 Controller
AES-NIno data+
FMAno data+
AVXno data+
FRTCno data1
PowerTuneno data-
TrueAudiono data+
PowerNowno data+
PowerGatingno data+
Out-of-band client managementno data+
VirusProtectno data+
HSAno data1
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo P8800 and A6-7000 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo P8800 and A6-7000 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data1
VT-x+no data
IOMMU 2.0no data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo P8800 and A6-7000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R4 Graphics
iGPU core countno data3
Endurono data+
Switchable graphicsno data1
UVDno data+
VCEno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core 2 Duo P8800 and A6-7000 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core 2 Duo P8800 and A6-7000 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkanno data1

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo P8800 and A6-7000.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo P8800 0.61
A6-7000 0.65
+6.6%

A6-7000 outperforms Core 2 Duo P8800 by 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core 2 Duo P8800 949
A6-7000 1010
+6.4%

A6-7000 outperforms Core 2 Duo P8800 by 6% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.61 0.65
Recency 1 April 2009 1 June 2014
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 17 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core 2 Duo P8800 and A6-7000.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo P8800 and A6-7000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo P8800
Core 2 Duo P8800
AMD A6-7000
A6-7000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 25 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo P8800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 7 votes

Rate A6-7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo P8800 or A6-7000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.