Xeon Gold 5318H vs Core 2 Duo P8700

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo P8700
2009, $209
2 cores / 2 threads, 25 Watt
0.55
Xeon Gold 5318H
2021
18 cores / 36 threads, 150 Watt
16.74
+2944%

Xeon Gold 5318H outperforms Core 2 Duo P8700 by a whopping 2944% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3131471
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core 2 Duono data
Power efficiency0.934.71
DesignerIntelIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Cooper Lake-SP (2021)
Release date1 January 2009 (17 years ago)6 April 2021 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$209no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo P8700 and Xeon Gold 5318H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)18 (Octadeca-Core)
Threads236
Base clock speed2.53 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.53 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache3 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB L2 Cache24.75 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1V - 1.25Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo P8700 and Xeon Gold 5318H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data4
SocketBGA479,PGA478FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo P8700 and Xeon Gold 5318H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo P8700 and Xeon Gold 5318H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo P8700 and Xeon Gold 5318H are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo P8700 and Xeon Gold 5318H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4 RDIMM
Maximum memory sizeno data1.12 TB
Max memory channelsno data6
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo P8700 and Xeon Gold 5318H.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data48

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Core 2 Duo P8700 0.55
Xeon Gold 5318H 16.74
+2944%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Core 2 Duo P8700 970
Samples: 1404
Xeon Gold 5318H 29301
+2921%
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.55 16.74
Recency 1 January 2009 6 April 2021
Physical cores 2 18
Threads 2 36
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 150 Watt

Core 2 Duo P8700 has 500% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 5318H, on the other hand, has a 2944% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 800% more physical cores and 1700% more threads, and a 221% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Xeon Gold 5318H is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core 2 Duo P8700 is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 5318H is a server/workstation one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 189 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo P8700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5318H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core 2 Duo P8700 and Xeon Gold 5318H, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.