Embedded G-Series T40N vs Core 2 Duo P8700
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3131 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.02 | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Duo | AMD Embedded G-Series |
| Power efficiency | 0.93 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Bobcat |
| Release date | 1 January 2009 (17 years ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $209 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Core 2 Duo P8700 and Embedded G-Series T40N: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.53 GHz | 1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.53 GHz | 1.1 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1066 MHz | no data |
| Multiplier | no data | 10 |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 3 MB L2 Cache | no data |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 40 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 75 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | 451 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| VID voltage range | 1V - 1.25V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo P8700 and Embedded G-Series T40N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | BGA479,PGA478 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 18 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo P8700 and Embedded G-Series T40N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo P8700 and Embedded G-Series T40N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo P8700 and Embedded G-Series T40N are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo P8700 and Embedded G-Series T40N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 8.53 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon HD 6290 |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 18 Watt |
Embedded G-Series T40N has a 13% more advanced lithography process, and 39% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 and AMD Embedded G-Series T40N. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
