Core 2 Duo T6670 vs Core 2 Duo P7570

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo P7570
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 25 Watt
0.53
+1.9%
Core 2 Duo T6670
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.52

Core 2 Duo P7570 outperforms Core 2 Duo T6670 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo P7570 and Core 2 Duo T6670 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28492860
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
Power efficiency2.011.41
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date1 October 2009 (15 years ago)1 January 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo P7570 and Core 2 Duo T6670 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.26 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.26 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHz800 MHz
L2 cache3 MB2 MB
L3 cache3 MB L2 Cache2 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size107 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
Number of transistors410 Million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo P7570 and Core 2 Duo T6670 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPGA478PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo P7570 and Core 2 Duo T6670. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo P7570 and Core 2 Duo T6670 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo P7570 and Core 2 Duo T6670 are enumerated here.

VT-x++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo P7570 0.53
+1.9%
Core 2 Duo T6670 0.52

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo P7570 845
+2.2%
Core 2 Duo T6670 827

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Core 2 Duo P7570 2470
+4.4%
Core 2 Duo T6670 2365

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Core 2 Duo P7570 4600
+3.8%
Core 2 Duo T6670 4430

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Duo P7570 2050
+10.8%
Core 2 Duo T6670 1850

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.53 0.52
Recency 1 October 2009 1 January 2009
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 35 Watt

Core 2 Duo P7570 has a 1.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 months, and 40% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core 2 Duo P7570 and Core 2 Duo T6670.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo P7570 and Core 2 Duo T6670, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo P7570
Core 2 Duo P7570
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670
Core 2 Duo T6670

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 4 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo P7570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 27 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T6670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo P7570 or Core 2 Duo T6670, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.