A4-3330MX vs Core 2 Duo P7550

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo P7550
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 25 Watt
0.53
+10.4%
A4-3330MX
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 45 Watt
0.48

Core 2 Duo P7550 outperforms A4-3330MX by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo P7550 and A4-3330MX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28602918
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoAMD A-Series
Power efficiency2.011.01
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date1 October 2009 (15 years ago)20 December 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo P7550 and A4-3330MX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.26 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.26 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data128K (per core)
L2 cache3 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size107 mm2228 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo P7550 and A4-3330MX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPGA478FS1
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo P7550 and A4-3330MX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480G
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo P7550 and A4-3330MX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo P7550 and A4-3330MX are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo P7550 and A4-3330MX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 6480G (444 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo P7550 0.53
+10.4%
A4-3330MX 0.48

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo P7550 849
+12.3%
A4-3330MX 756

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Core 2 Duo P7550 273
+7.1%
A4-3330MX 255

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Core 2 Duo P7550 436
+2.3%
A4-3330MX 426

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.53 0.48
Recency 1 October 2009 20 December 2011
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 45 Watt

Core 2 Duo P7550 has a 10.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 80% lower power consumption.

A4-3330MX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Core 2 Duo P7550 is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-3330MX in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo P7550 and A4-3330MX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo P7550
Core 2 Duo P7550
AMD A4-3330MX
A4-3330MX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 14 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo P7550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 5 votes

Rate A4-3330MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo P7550 or A4-3330MX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.