Turion 64 X2 TL-64 vs Core 2 Duo P7450

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo P7450
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 25 Watt
0.49
+11.4%
Turion 64 X2 TL-64
2007
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.44

Core 2 Duo P7450 outperforms Turion 64 X2 TL-64 by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo P7450 and Turion 64 X2 TL-64 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28992961
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 Duo2x AMD Turion 64
Power efficiency1.851.19
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Trinidad (2006−2007)
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years ago)13 April 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo P7450 and Turion 64 X2 TL-64 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.13 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.13 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHz800 MHz
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cache3 MB1 MB
L3 cache3 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size107 mm2147 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C95 °C
Number of transistors410 Million154 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.05V-1.15Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo P7450 and Turion 64 X2 TL-64 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGA479,BGA956,PGA478S1
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo P7450 and Turion 64 X2 TL-64. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data65 nm, 1.075
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo P7450 and Turion 64 X2 TL-64 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo P7450 and Turion 64 X2 TL-64 are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo P7450 0.49
+11.4%
Turion 64 X2 TL-64 0.44

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo P7450 783
+13.2%
Turion 64 X2 TL-64 692

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Core 2 Duo P7450 2306
+33.6%
Turion 64 X2 TL-64 1726

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Core 2 Duo P7450 4373
+36.6%
Turion 64 X2 TL-64 3201

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Duo P7450 1900
+25.2%
Turion 64 X2 TL-64 1518

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.49 0.44
Recency 1 January 2009 13 April 2007
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 35 Watt

Core 2 Duo P7450 has a 11.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 40% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Duo P7450 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion 64 X2 TL-64 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo P7450 and Turion 64 X2 TL-64, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo P7450
Core 2 Duo P7450
AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-64
Turion 64 X2 TL-64

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 16 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo P7450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 21 vote

Rate Turion 64 X2 TL-64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo P7450 or Turion 64 X2 TL-64, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.