Xeon w7-2575X vs Core 2 Duo P7370

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo P7370
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 25 Watt
0.50
Xeon w7-2575X
2024
22 cores / 44 threads, 250 Watt
38.66
+7632%

Xeon w7-2575X outperforms Core 2 Duo P7370 by a whopping 7632% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo P7370 and Xeon w7-2575X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking289274
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data69.51
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core 2 Duono data
Power efficiency1.8814.56
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years ago)24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,689

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo P7370 and Xeon w7-2575X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)22 (Docosa-Core)
Threads244
Base clock speed2 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cache3 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB L2 Cache45 MB
Chip lithography45 nmIntel 7 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data76 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range1V-1.25Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo P7370 and Xeon w7-2575X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPGA478FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt250 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo P7370 and Xeon w7-2575X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Demand Based Switching-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FSB parity-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo P7370 and Xeon w7-2575X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo P7370 and Xeon w7-2575X are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo P7370 and Xeon w7-2575X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data2 TB
Max memory channelsno data4
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo P7370 and Xeon w7-2575X.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo P7370 0.50
Xeon w7-2575X 38.66
+7632%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo P7370 790
Xeon w7-2575X 61402
+7672%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.50 38.66
Recency 1 January 2009 24 August 2024
Physical cores 2 22
Threads 2 44
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 250 Watt

Core 2 Duo P7370 has 900% lower power consumption.

Xeon w7-2575X, on the other hand, has a 7632% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, and 1000% more physical cores and 2100% more threads.

The Xeon w7-2575X is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo P7370 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core 2 Duo P7370 is a notebook processor while Xeon w7-2575X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo P7370 and Xeon w7-2575X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo P7370
Core 2 Duo P7370
Intel Xeon w7-2575X
Xeon w7-2575X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Core 2 Duo P7370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon w7-2575X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo P7370 or Xeon w7-2575X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.