E1-7010 vs Core 2 Duo L7700

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo L7700
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.38
E1-7010
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.38

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo L7700 and E1-7010 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30203029
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCore 2 DuoAMD E-Series
Power efficiency2.103.58
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Carrizo-L (2015)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)7 May 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo L7700 and E1-7010 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L2 cacheno data1024 KB
L3 cache4 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography65 nm28 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C90 °C
Number of transistorsno data930 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.9V-1.2Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo L7700 and E1-7010 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socketno dataFP4
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo L7700 and E1-7010. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VT
AES-NI-+
FMA-FMA4
AVX-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo L7700 and E1-7010 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo L7700 and E1-7010 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo L7700 and E1-7010. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3L-1333
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R2 Graphics
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core 2 Duo L7700 and E1-7010 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core 2 Duo L7700 and E1-7010 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo L7700 and E1-7010.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo L7700 0.38
E1-7010 0.38

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo L7700 607
+1.8%
E1-7010 596

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Core 2 Duo L7700 257
+99.2%
E1-7010 129

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Core 2 Duo L7700 455
+108%
E1-7010 219

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 10 Watt

E1-7010 has a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 70% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core 2 Duo L7700 and E1-7010.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo L7700 and E1-7010, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo L7700
Core 2 Duo L7700
AMD E1-7010
E1-7010

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core 2 Duo L7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 228 votes

Rate E1-7010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo L7700 or E1-7010, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.