Core 2 Duo SL9300 vs Core 2 Duo E8135

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3055not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core 2 Duo
Power efficiency1.41no data
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date3 March 2009 (16 years ago)20 August 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$284

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo E8135 and Core 2 Duo SL9300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.667 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed0.67 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rateno data1066 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache6 MB (shared)6 MB
L3 cacheno data6 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size107 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors410 million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo E8135 and Core 2 Duo SL9300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketPBGA956
Power consumption (TDP)44 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo E8135 and Core 2 Duo SL9300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo E8135 and Core 2 Duo SL9300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo E8135 and Core 2 Duo SL9300 are enumerated here.

VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo E8135 and Core 2 Duo SL9300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2, DDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 March 2009 20 August 2008
Power consumption (TDP) 44 Watt 17 Watt

Core 2 Duo E8135 has an age advantage of 6 months.

Core 2 Duo SL9300, on the other hand, has 158.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Intel Core 2 Duo E8135 and Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo E8135
Core 2 Duo E8135
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300
Core 2 Duo SL9300

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 2 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo E8135 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 6 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo SL9300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core 2 Duo E8135 and Core 2 Duo SL9300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.