A4-9120C vs Core 2 Duo E7400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo E7400
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.67
+21.8%

Core 2 Duo E7400 outperforms A4-9120C by a significant 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo E7400 and A4-9120C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27202809
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Bristol Ridge
Architecture codenameWolfdale (2008−2010)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release dateOctober 2008 (15 years ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo E7400 and A4-9120C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHzno data
Multiplierno data16
L1 cache64 KB160 KB
L2 cache3 MB (shared)1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Die size82 mm2124.5 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors228 million1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo E7400 and A4-9120C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketLGA775BGA
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo E7400 and A4-9120C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataVirtualization,
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo E7400 and A4-9120C technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo E7400 and A4-9120C are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo E7400 and A4-9120C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR4
Maximum memory bandwidthno data14.936 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo E7400 0.67
+21.8%
A4-9120C 0.55

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo E7400 1027
+20.5%
A4-9120C 852

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.67 0.55
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 6 Watt

Core 2 Duo E7400 has a 21.8% higher aggregate performance score.

A4-9120C, on the other hand, has a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 983.3% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Duo E7400 is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-9120C in performance tests.

Note that Core 2 Duo E7400 is a desktop processor while A4-9120C is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E7400 and A4-9120C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo E7400
Core 2 Duo E7400
AMD A4-9120C
A4-9120C

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 335 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo E7400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 74 votes

Rate A4-9120C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo E7400 or A4-9120C, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.