Core 2 Extreme X7800 vs Core 2 Duo E6850
Aggregate performance score
Core 2 Extreme X7800 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6850 by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Duo E6850 and Core 2 Extreme X7800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2591 | 2581 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.42 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | Core 2 Duo (Desktop) | Intel Core 2 Extreme |
| Architecture codename | Conroe (2006−2007) | Merom XE (2007) |
| Release date | no data | 17 July 2007 (16 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $851 |
| Current price | $182 | $299 (0.4x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo E6850 and Core 2 Extreme X7800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Bus support | 1333 MHz | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 4 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | no data | 143 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 291 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.1V-1.375V |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo E6850 and Core 2 Extreme X7800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | PPGA478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 44 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo E6850 and Core 2 Extreme X7800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
| Status | no data | Discontinued |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo E6850 and Core 2 Extreme X7800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo E6850 and Core 2 Extreme X7800 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | no data | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core 2 Extreme X7800 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6850 by 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core 2 Extreme X7800 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6850 by 2% in Passmark.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Core 2 Duo E6850 outperforms Core 2 Extreme X7800 by 28% in 3DMark06 CPU.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.72 | 0.74 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 44 Watt |
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core 2 Duo E6850 and Core 2 Extreme X7800.
Note that Core 2 Duo E6850 is a desktop processor while Core 2 Extreme X7800 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E6850 and Core 2 Extreme X7800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
