Microsoft SQ1 vs Core 2 Duo E6750

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo E6750
2007
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.64
Microsoft SQ1
2019
8 cores / 8 threads
3.73
+483%

Microsoft SQ1 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6750 by a whopping 483% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo E6750 and Microsoft SQ1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27741489
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataQualcomm Snapdragon
Power efficiency0.93no data
Architecture codenameConroe (2006−2007)Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019)
Release dateJuly 2007 (17 years ago)2 October 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo E6750 and Microsoft SQ1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed2.66 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.67 GHz3 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KBno data
L2 cache4 MBno data
L3 cache0 KB2 MB
Chip lithography65 nm7 nm
Die size143 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature72 °Cno data
Number of transistors291 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo E6750 and Microsoft SQ1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketPLGA775no data
Power consumption (TDP)65 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo E6750 and Microsoft SQ1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo E6750 and Microsoft SQ1 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo E6750 and Microsoft SQ1 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo E6750 and Microsoft SQ1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataQualcomm Adreno 685

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo E6750 0.64
Microsoft SQ1 3.73
+483%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo E6750 1014
Microsoft SQ1 5918
+484%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.64 3.73
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm

Microsoft SQ1 has a 482.8% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Microsoft SQ1 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo E6750 in performance tests.

Note that Core 2 Duo E6750 is a desktop processor while Microsoft SQ1 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E6750 and Microsoft SQ1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo E6750
Core 2 Duo E6750
Microsoft SQ1
SQ1

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 213 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo E6750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 58 votes

Rate Microsoft SQ1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo E6750 or Microsoft SQ1, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.