Core 2 Duo SP7500 vs Core 2 Duo E6750

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo E6750
2007
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.59
+84.4%

Core 2 Duo E6750 outperforms Core 2 Duo SP7500 by an impressive 84% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30963384
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core 2 Duo
Power efficiency0.380.68
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameConroe (2006−2007)Merom (2006−2008)
Release dateJuly 2007 (18 years ago)15 January 2008 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Core 2 Duo E6750 and Core 2 Duo SP7500: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.66 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.67 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHz800 MHz
L1 cache64 KBno data
L2 cache4 MB4 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Die size143 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature72 °Cno data
Number of transistors291 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo E6750 and Core 2 Duo SP7500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketPLGA775no data
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt20 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo E6750 and Core 2 Duo SP7500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo E6750 and Core 2 Duo SP7500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo E6750 and Core 2 Duo SP7500 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo E6750 and Core 2 Duo SP7500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.59 0.32
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 20 Watt

Core 2 Duo E6750 has a 84% higher aggregate performance score.

Core 2 Duo SP7500, on the other hand, has 225% lower power consumption.

The Intel Core 2 Duo E6750 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 in performance tests.

Note that Core 2 Duo E6750 is a desktop processor while Core 2 Duo SP7500 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 225 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo E6750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core 2 Duo SP7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core 2 Duo E6750 and Core 2 Duo SP7500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.