Athlon 1100 vs Core 2 Duo E6750

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo E6750 and Athlon 1100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2753not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.93no data
Architecture codenameConroe (2006−2007)Thunderbird B (2000−2001)
Release dateJuly 2007 (17 years ago)August 2000 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo E6750 and Athlon 1100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed2.66 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.67 GHz1.1 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB128 KB
L2 cache4 MB256 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm180 nm
Die size143 mm2120 mm2
Maximum core temperature72 °Cno data
Number of transistors291 million37 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo E6750 and Athlon 1100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPLGA775A
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt60 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo E6750 and Athlon 1100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo E6750 and Athlon 1100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo E6750 and Athlon 1100 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo E6750 and Athlon 1100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR1

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 65 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 60 Watt

Core 2 Duo E6750 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 176.9% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon 1100, on the other hand, has 8.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo E6750 and Athlon 1100. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E6750 and Athlon 1100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo E6750
Core 2 Duo E6750
AMD Athlon 1100
Athlon 1100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 210 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo E6750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Athlon 1100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo E6750 or Athlon 1100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.